AGRAVO DE INSTRUMENTO E INDEFERIMENTO DE PRODUÇÃO DE PROVAS
Abstract
O presente artigo tem como finalidade analisar a possibilidade de interposição de agravo de instrumento diante do indeferimento da produção probatória. Para tanto, foi utilizada metodologia qualitativa, informada por bibliografias e por jurisprudências sobre o tema. Sistematicamente, o artigo teve início com considerações sobre a relevância da produção de provas no processo civil, seguidas pela evolução histórica do agravo de instrumento no Direito Brasileiro. Em seguida, foram apresentadas questões relativas à taxatividade do rol do art. 1.015 do Código de Processo Civil de 2015, ilustradas por meio de julgados pertinentes ao tema. Por fim, concluiu-se pelo cabimento, em situações específicas, de agravo de instrumento, de forma a garantir os princípios do contraditório, da ampla defesa, da inafastabilidade da jurisdição, da celeridade e da economia processual, observado o requisito da urgência, na forma do precedente fixado pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiça, no tema 988.
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with recognition of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The author declares to be responsible for the originality, uniqueness and currency of the article content, by means of complete references to all consulted sources.
Each author grants to the LexCult Journal permission to evaluate, normalize, edit and publish the submitted article, in an unprecedented way.
Plagiarism cases and self plagiarism will not be accepted under no circumstances. The plagiarist will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years.
The copy, in full or to some extent, of an article published in LexCult Journal will be allowed as long as the source (author and Journal) is informed, being forbidden the commercial use and the production and distribution of derivative works. In case the exclusivity clause is broken, the submission will be filed and the author will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years, without bringing any civil actions provided by national law.
The author is aware that:
a) Submissions may be rejected if the journal's Editorial Board, responsible for evaluation and article selection, does not consider it pertinent for publication, whatever may be the well-justified reasons;
b) Editors reserve the right to modify the submitted manuscript - without any content alteration - in view of its normalization and adaptation to the publication norms.
