UM ESTUDO COMPARATIVO SOBRE A PENA DE MORTE IMPUTADA ÀS MULHERES ADÚLTERAS NO FUERO JUZGO
Abstract
In this text, through the Comparative Method in History proposed by Jürgen Kocka, we will specifically analyze the penalties imposed on women judged as perpetrators of the crime of adultery in Medieval Castile of the century. XIII, For this, we will focus specifically on three cases, contained in the Fuero Juzgo, - legal work sent for translation, adapted and elaborated under the reign of Fernando III (1217-1252), composed of matters of ecclesiastical law, of the law of the king and customary usages and that interact with the purpose of ordering the populations that inhabit this peninsular territory -, in which they are assigned the death penalty for infringing the royal law, being considered, therefore, as authors of the error and, consequently, responsible for him. This analysis will allow us to understand the legal policy of the Castilian monarchy with regard to women agents of crimes/mistakes, especially with regard to the punishments attributed to them, as well as the criteria established by the monarch to allocate different penalties for the same infraction.
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with recognition of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The author declares to be responsible for the originality, uniqueness and currency of the article content, by means of complete references to all consulted sources.
Each author grants to the LexCult Journal permission to evaluate, normalize, edit and publish the submitted article, in an unprecedented way.
Plagiarism cases and self plagiarism will not be accepted under no circumstances. The plagiarist will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years.
The copy, in full or to some extent, of an article published in LexCult Journal will be allowed as long as the source (author and Journal) is informed, being forbidden the commercial use and the production and distribution of derivative works. In case the exclusivity clause is broken, the submission will be filed and the author will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years, without bringing any civil actions provided by national law.
The author is aware that:
a) Submissions may be rejected if the journal's Editorial Board, responsible for evaluation and article selection, does not consider it pertinent for publication, whatever may be the well-justified reasons;
b) Editors reserve the right to modify the submitted manuscript - without any content alteration - in view of its normalization and adaptation to the publication norms.
