THE GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF CIVIL PROCEEDINGS AND THEIR COMPATIBILITY WITH THE CREATION AND APPLICATION OF THE EXTENDED JUDGMENT TECHNIQUE
Abstract
The present article has as object the study, using bibliographic researches, of the new technique of extended judgment foreseen in article 942 of the Code of Civil Procedure of 2015 and his compatibility with the procedural principles. In the structure of the article, after the introduction, the extended judgment technique as a substitute for the old infringing embargoes is examined and, finally, the relation of the technique with the procedural principles is presented, which, with the tendency of constitutionalizing the process it becomes an indispensable subject to understand the impacts of the new institute.
Downloads
References
BONFIM, Edilson Mougenot. Curso de processo penal. 10. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2015.
BRASIL. Exposição de motivos do código de processo civil: Lei nº 13.105, de 16 de março de 2015. In: ABREU FILHO, Nylson Paim de (org.). VADE mecum: interativo. Porto Alegre: Verbo Jurídico, 2020. Disponível em: http://www.verbojuridico.com.br/vademecum/CPC_EXPOSICAO_DE_MOTIVOS.pdf. Acesso em: 20 ago. 2019.
CÂMARA JUNIOR, José Maria. Técnica de colegialidade do artigo 942 do CPC: extensão e profundidade da matéria submetida ao julgamento prolongado. In: NERY JUNIOR, Nelson; ALVIM, Teresa Arruda. Aspectos polêmicos dos recursos cíveis e assuntos afins. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2017. No prelo.
CARNEIRO, Paulo Cezar Pinheiro. Das normas fundamentais do processo civil. In: WAMBIER, Teresa Arruda Alvim; DIDIER JUNIOR, Fredie; TALAMINI, Eduardo; DANTAS, Bruno. Breves comentários ao novo código de processo civil. 2. ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2016. p. 57-104.
DALLARI, Dalmo de Abreu. A constituição na vida dos povos: da Idade Média ao século XXI. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2010.
DINAMARCO, Cândido; LOPES, Bruno. Teoria geral do novo processo civil. 2. ed. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2017.
DANTAS, Marcelo Navarro Ribeiro. A problemática dos embargos infringentes no projeto do novo código de processo civil. Salvador: JusPODIVM, 2013.
DIDIER JUNIOR, Fredie; CUNHA, Leonardo Carneiro da. Curso de direito processual civil: meios de impugnação às decisões judiciais e processo nos tribunais. 13. ed. Salvador: JusPODIVM, 2016.
FREIRE, Rodrigo da Cunha Lima. A técnica da complementação do julgamento da apelação no novo CPC. [S. l.], 2015. Disponível em: http://portalprocessual.com/a-tecnica-da-complementacao-do-julgamento-da-apelacao-no-novo- cpc/. Acesso em: 21 jul. 2019.
LUCON, Paulo Henrique dos Santos. Técnica criada no novo CPC permite decisões com mais qualidade. Consultor Jurídico, [S. l.], p. 1-8, 2015. Disponível em: http://www.conjur.com.br/2015-fev-04/paulo-lucon-cpc-permite-decisoes-qualidade#_ftn5. Acesso em: 03 jul. 2019.
MARINONI, Luiz Guilherme; ARENHART, Sérgio Cruz; MITIDIERO, Daniel. Novo código de processo civil comentado. 2. ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2016.
NERY JUNIOR, Nelson. Princípios do processo na constituição federal. 9. ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2009.
SANTOS. Eduardo Rodrigues. Princípios processuais constitucionais. Salvador: JusPODIVM, 2016.
SILVA, José Afonso da. Curso de direito constitucional positivo. 25. ed. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2005.
STRECK, Lenio Luiz. Hermenêutica, constituição e processo. Belo Horizonte: Del Rey, 2009.
ZARIF, Cláudio Cintra. Da necessidade de repensar o processo para que ele seja realmente efetivo. In: FUX, Luiz; NERY JUNIOR, Nelson; WAMBIER, Teresa Arruda Alvim. Processo e constituição: estudos em homenagem ao Professor José Carlos Barbosa Moreira. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2006. p. 139-145.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with recognition of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The author declares to be responsible for the originality, uniqueness and currency of the article content, by means of complete references to all consulted sources.
Each author grants to the LexCult Journal permission to evaluate, normalize, edit and publish the submitted article, in an unprecedented way.
Plagiarism cases and self plagiarism will not be accepted under no circumstances. The plagiarist will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years.
The copy, in full or to some extent, of an article published in LexCult Journal will be allowed as long as the source (author and Journal) is informed, being forbidden the commercial use and the production and distribution of derivative works. In case the exclusivity clause is broken, the submission will be filed and the author will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years, without bringing any civil actions provided by national law.
The author is aware that:
a) Submissions may be rejected if the journal's Editorial Board, responsible for evaluation and article selection, does not consider it pertinent for publication, whatever may be the well-justified reasons;
b) Editors reserve the right to modify the submitted manuscript - without any content alteration - in view of its normalization and adaptation to the publication norms.
