WORK AS RESOCIALIZADOR AXIS OF THE PRISON SYSTEM’S EGRESS

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30749/2177-8337.v22n42p97-109

Abstract

The Deprivation of Freedom is the most serious of the judicial sanctions in the Brazilian Legal System. The egresses of the Prison System suffer incessantly with the lack of opportunities and stigmas, besides the failure of the resocialization. The present work aimed to analyze the experience of the program "Segunda Chance" (Second Chance), of the NGO Afro Reggae, in what concerns the working assistance given to the egresses of the Prison System. Two samples of ex-convicts facts withdrawn from the archives of the organization (ranging from January 1st 2013 to May 31st 2013, and from January 1st 2014 to May 31st 2014) were analyzed, giving us the possibility to verify that the greatest obstacle the mentioned institution faces to reinsert ex-convicts in the job market is the low schooling and the lack of personal documents, such as the voter registration and the driver's license.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Andréa Maria Silva de Assis, UNISUAM

Mestre em Desenvolvimento Local pelo Centro Universitário Augusto Motta, UNISUAM, Brasil. Especialista pela Universidade Veiga de Almeida (2011). Tem experiência na área do Direito.

Reis Friede, UNISUAM

Desembargador Federal, Diretor do Centro Cultural da Justiça Federal (CCJF), Mestre e Doutor em Direito. Professor e Pesquisador do Programa de Mestrado em Desenvolvimento Local do Centro Universitário Augusto Motta (UNISUAM), no Rio de Janeiro.

Kátia Eliane Santos Avelar, UNISUAM

Mestre em Ciências Biológicas pela Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) (1996).  Doutora em Ciências também pela Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (2002). Atualmente é coordenadora do Laboratório de Referência Nacional para Leptospirose do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ). Professora Titular e Pesquisadora do Programa de Pós-Graduação Profissional Interdisciplinar em Desenvolvimento Local do Centro Universitário Augusto Motta (UNISUAM).

Maria Geralda de Miranda, UNISUAM

Mestre em Literatura Comparada com ênfase nos estudos culturais pela Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) e Doutora em Letras com ênfase em estudos pós-coloniais, também pela UFF. Professora do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Desenvolvimento Local, do Centro Universitário Augusto Motta, UNISUAM.

References

AFROREGGAE. Programa Segunda Chance. [2010]. Disponível em:
. Acesso em: 21 ago. 2013.

ENTREVISTAS com os responsáveis pela ong afroreagge. Realizada por Andrea Maria Silva de Assis, em 10 nov. 2010. Disponível em . Acesso em: 21 ago. 2013.

FERREIRA, Aurélio B. de H. Novo Aurélio do século XXI: dicionário da língua portuguesa. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 1999.

FOUCAULT, Michel. Vigiar e punir: a história da violência nas prisões. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1997.

RODRIGUES, Anabela Miranda. Novo olhar sobre a questão penitenciaria. São Paulo: RT, 2001.

THOMPSON, Augusto. A questão penitenciária: de acordo com a Constituição de 1988. 5. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2002.
Published
2018-06-27
How to Cite
ASSIS, Andréa Maria Silva de et al. WORK AS RESOCIALIZADOR AXIS OF THE PRISON SYSTEM’S EGRESS. Journal from the Judiciary Section of Rio de Janeiro, [S.l.], v. 22, n. 42, p. 97-109, june 2018. ISSN 2177-8337. Available at: <http://177.223.208.8/index.php/revistasjrj/article/view/30>. Date accessed: 29 nov. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.30749/2177-8337.v22n42p97-109.
Citation Formats
Issue
Vol 22 No 42 (2018): Law and Society
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with recognition of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.

The author declares to be responsible for the originality, uniqueness and currency of the article content, by means of complete references to all consulted sources.

Each author grants to the LexCult Journal permission to evaluate, normalize, edit and publish the submitted article, in an unprecedented way.

Plagiarism cases and self plagiarism will not be accepted under no circumstances. The plagiarist will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years.

The copy, in full or to some extent, of an article published in LexCult Journal will be allowed as long as the source (author and Journal) is informed, being forbidden the commercial use and the production and distribution of derivative works. In case the exclusivity clause is broken, the submission will be filed and the author will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years, without bringing any civil actions provided by national law.

The author is aware that:

a) Submissions may be rejected if the journal's Editorial Board, responsible for evaluation and article selection, does not consider it pertinent for publication, whatever may be the well-justified reasons;

b) Editors reserve the right to modify the submitted manuscript - without any content alteration - in view of its normalization and adaptation to the publication norms.