DEATH BENEFIT: CONCURRENCE BETWEEN THE WIDOW AND THE EX-WIFE RECEIVING FOOD PENSION
Abstract
This article aims to analyze critically the social security legislation regarding the death benefit, specifically in relation to the hypothesis of competition of the surviving spouse and the former spouse receiving alimony. In addition, it aims to analyze the two dominant jurisprudential positions in the subject, the first which favors the interaction between social security law and civil law, supporting the maintenance of the amounts due as food in the death pension, and the second which sustains the prevailing social security legislation, with equal conditions among the beneficiaries. Finally, this paper defends the prevalence of the first position, through revision and legislative amendment, adjusting the social security norm to the postulates of justice and equity.
Downloads
References
< http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm>. Acesso em: 27 ago. 2017.
BRASIL. Decreto nº 89.312, de 23 de janeiro de 1984. Disponível em:
BRASIL. Lei nº 8.213, de 24 de julho de 1991. Dispõe sobre os Planos de Benefícios da Previdência Social e dá outras providências. Disponível em:
BRASIL. Lei nº 10.406, de 10 de janeiro de 2002. Institui o Código Civil. Disponível em:
BRASIL. Superior Tribunal de Justiça. Agravo regimental no recurso especial nº 993.646-RJ (2007⁄0229109-1). Agravante: Maria Alice de Barros Rocco. Agravado: Myrna Katona Faria. Relator: Ministro Walter de Almeida Guilherme. Brasília, DF, 4 de dezembro de 2014. Revista Eletrônica da Jurisprudência do STJ, Brasília, DF, 2015. Disponível em:
BRASIL. Tribunal Regional Federal (2. Região). Apelação cível nº 2002.51.01.503923-2. Apelante: Celia Diehl Corazza. Apelada: Marina de Souza Pires. Relator: Desembargador Federal Abel Gomes. Rio de Janeiro, 20 de julho de 2005. Disponível em:
BRASIL. Tribunal Regional Federal (3. Região). Apelação cível nº 0008644-55.2005.4.03.6104/SP (2005.61.04.008644-5/SP). Apelante: Sonia Maria de Araujo Franca. Apelada: Instituto Nacional do Seguro Social – INSS. Relator: Desembargador Federal Carlos Delgado. São Paulo, 04 de setembro de 2017. Diário Eletrônico da Justiça Federal da 3ª Região, São Paulo, n. 173, 18 set. 2017. Judicial I. Disponível em:
GRAU, Eros Roberto. Ensaio e discurso sobre a interpretação/aplicação do Direito. 4.ed. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2006.
IBRAHIM, Fábio Zambitte. Curso de Direto Previdenciário. 7.ed. Rio de Janeiro: Impetus, 2006.
MARINONI, Luiz Guilherme. Precedentes Obrigatórios. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2010.
MELLO, Celso Antônio Bandeira de. Conteúdo Jurídico do Princípio da Igualdade. 3.ed. e atual. São Paulo: Malheiros Editores, 1999.
VENOSA, Sílvio de Salvo. Direito Civil-Direito de Família. 12.ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2012.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with recognition of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The author declares to be responsible for the originality, uniqueness and currency of the article content, by means of complete references to all consulted sources.
Each author grants to the LexCult Journal permission to evaluate, normalize, edit and publish the submitted article, in an unprecedented way.
Plagiarism cases and self plagiarism will not be accepted under no circumstances. The plagiarist will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years.
The copy, in full or to some extent, of an article published in LexCult Journal will be allowed as long as the source (author and Journal) is informed, being forbidden the commercial use and the production and distribution of derivative works. In case the exclusivity clause is broken, the submission will be filed and the author will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years, without bringing any civil actions provided by national law.
The author is aware that:
a) Submissions may be rejected if the journal's Editorial Board, responsible for evaluation and article selection, does not consider it pertinent for publication, whatever may be the well-justified reasons;
b) Editors reserve the right to modify the submitted manuscript - without any content alteration - in view of its normalization and adaptation to the publication norms.
