THE LEGAL DECISIONS OF CARL SCHMITT
Abstract
This study aims to discuss the jusphilosophical theory of Decisionism, which is based on the knowledge base of scholars in this strand of thought, such as Carl Shimitt. In Schmittian understanding, the sovereign decision is the absolute beginning, and the beginning is nothing more than a sovereign decision that takes exceptionality as a commandment. Since there is no rule to apply to chaos, order must be established by a decision. She, the decision, is what will make the order meaningful. In elaborating the premises of his theory, Schmitt considers that the sovereign will puts an end to disorder and ensures, through his commandments, law, security and peace. It is in this context that the idea of exception arises (from the Latin Excipere, that is, to take from or take from) and that the sovereign decision consists in abstracting itself from the disorder and subtracting itself from the normative nothingness to move to a rule of law.
Downloads
References
AMENDOLA, Adalgiso. Carl Schmitt tra decisione e ordinamento concreto. Nápoles: ESI, 1999.
ARAÚJO, Gisele Silva; SANTOS, Rogerio Dultra dos. O constitucionalismo antiliberal de Carl Schmitt: democracia substantiva e exceção versus liberalismo kelseniano in Curso de Ciência Política. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2011.
BILLIER, Jean-Carrien; MARYIOLI, Aglaé. História da Filosofia do Direito. Trad. Pedro Henriques. Lisboa: Instituto Piaget, 2001.
BODIN, Jean. Os seis livros da República. Trad. José Ignácio Coelho Mendes Neto. São Paulo: Ícone, 2011.
CASERTA, Marco. Democrazia e costituzione in Hans Kelsen e Carl Schmitt. Roma: Aracne, 2005.
GALLI, Carlo. Genealogia della política. Bolonha: Il mulino, 2010.
GETTELL, Raymond G.. História das idéias políticas. Rio de Janeiro: Alba, 1941.
GROTIUS, Hugo. O direito da guerra e da paz. Unijuí, 2004.
IORIO, Bruno. Analise del decisionismo. Nápoles: Giannini, 1987.
KERVÉGAN, Jean-François. Hegel, Carl Schmitt: o político entre a especulação e a positividade. Trad. Carolina Huang. São Paulo: Manole, 2006.
LARENZ, Karl. Metodologia da ciência do direito. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Golbenkian. 1960.
NAVARRETE, Lorca. Temas de teoría y filosofía del derecho. Madri: Pirâmide, 1993.
NEGRETTO, Gabriel L. El concepto de decisionismo em Carl Schmitt. México: Ultimo Reduto, 2000.
MACHADO NETO, A. L. Compêndio de introdução à ciência do Direito. 4. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 1984.
POGGI, Gianfranco. A evolução do Estado moderno. Trad. Álvaro Cabral. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1981.
RÜTHERS, Bernd. Carl Schmitt en el Tercer Reich. Buenos Aires: Struhart & Cia., [198-?].
SCHMITT, Carl. Sobre os três tipos do pensamento jurídico. Trad. Peter Naumann. In: MACEDO JUNIOR., Ronaldo Porto. Carl Schmitt e a fundamentação do Direito. São Paulo: Max Limonad, 2001. p. 161- 217.
SCHMITT, Carl. Teologia política. Trad. Francisco Javier Conde. Buenos Aires: Struhart & Cia., 1998.
SCHMITT, Carl. Teoria de la constitución. Trad. Francisco Ayala. Buenos Aires: Struhart & Cia., [2001?].
VIANELLO, Lorenza Córdova. Derecho y poder. México: Fondo de cultura economica. 2010.
VILLACAÑAS, José Luis. Poder y conflicto: ensayos sobre Carl Schmitt. Madri: Biblioteca Nova, 2008.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with recognition of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The author declares to be responsible for the originality, uniqueness and currency of the article content, by means of complete references to all consulted sources.
Each author grants to the LexCult Journal permission to evaluate, normalize, edit and publish the submitted article, in an unprecedented way.
Plagiarism cases and self plagiarism will not be accepted under no circumstances. The plagiarist will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years.
The copy, in full or to some extent, of an article published in LexCult Journal will be allowed as long as the source (author and Journal) is informed, being forbidden the commercial use and the production and distribution of derivative works. In case the exclusivity clause is broken, the submission will be filed and the author will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years, without bringing any civil actions provided by national law.
The author is aware that:
a) Submissions may be rejected if the journal's Editorial Board, responsible for evaluation and article selection, does not consider it pertinent for publication, whatever may be the well-justified reasons;
b) Editors reserve the right to modify the submitted manuscript - without any content alteration - in view of its normalization and adaptation to the publication norms.
