PRESENT FATHER PROGRAM: ANALYSIS OF TWO CORREGEDORIAS’ PROVISIONS OF THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUSTICE AND COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE STATE OF GOIÁS
Abstract
This article aims to briefly analyze the public policy of the “Programa Pai Presente” through the provisions of the Corregedorias of the National Council of Justice and the Court of Justice of the State of Goiás. The program is a national campaign for spontaneous recognition of paternity of children without the father's name on the birth certificate, created by the Corregedoria of the National Council of Justice to reduce this statistic. What is the importance of the public policy promoted by the Corregedorias Nacional de Justiça and the Corregedorias do Estado de Goiás through the provisions on the Programa Pai Presente? The general objective is to analyze the provisions of the Corregedorias regarding the Program since its implementation between 2010 and 2021 at the national and state level. A bibliographic survey of the national legislation on the topic of filiation rights, concepts, analysis of the selected provisions on the Corregedorias websites and data on the lack of paternity registration and spontaneous acknowledgment of paternity during this period and the importance of this public policy promoted by the National Council of Justice was carried out. Finally, the provisions and the data show that the Corregedorias have promoted the Program through campaigns and have obtained good results. However, the campaigns should be permanent, especially in relation to the National Corregedoria, because the COVID-19 pandemic has increased the number of birth records without established paternity.
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with recognition of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The author declares to be responsible for the originality, uniqueness and currency of the article content, by means of complete references to all consulted sources.
Each author grants to the LexCult Journal permission to evaluate, normalize, edit and publish the submitted article, in an unprecedented way.
Plagiarism cases and self plagiarism will not be accepted under no circumstances. The plagiarist will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years.
The copy, in full or to some extent, of an article published in LexCult Journal will be allowed as long as the source (author and Journal) is informed, being forbidden the commercial use and the production and distribution of derivative works. In case the exclusivity clause is broken, the submission will be filed and the author will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years, without bringing any civil actions provided by national law.
The author is aware that:
a) Submissions may be rejected if the journal's Editorial Board, responsible for evaluation and article selection, does not consider it pertinent for publication, whatever may be the well-justified reasons;
b) Editors reserve the right to modify the submitted manuscript - without any content alteration - in view of its normalization and adaptation to the publication norms.
