UNCERTAINTIES ABOUT LEARNING WITH SOCIAL MEANING
UNCERTAINTIES ABOUT LEARNING WITH SOCIAL MEANING
Abstract
This article reflects on the effectiveness of Remote Emergency Education in the current year Continuum 2020/2021 in terms of providing opportunities for learning with social meaning (one of the principles defended by Paulo Freire) for students in state public schools in Bahia. Therefore, the focus of this study is to identify how the teaching process in state schools in Bahia is being planned and implemented during the pandemic period of 2021, to verify which resources and pedagogical strategies are being adopted to favor learning with social meaning for them( as) students. As well as discussing whether the education offered promotes emancipatory and critical training for students to act in society as advocated by Paulo Freire. The methodology is based on the literature review of the theoretical references of Freire (1996; 1987), for the documental analysis of the studied legislation about this form of school education qualified as Emergency Remote Teaching. The results of this study point to the uncertainty about the effectiveness of teaching that favors learning with social meaning aiming at the emancipation of students, children, youth, adults, men and women students of basic education, since the glaring economic and social inequalities in Brazil and in Bahia they compromise the full access of the subjects to this form of educational offer.Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with recognition of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The author declares to be responsible for the originality, uniqueness and currency of the article content, by means of complete references to all consulted sources.
Each author grants to the LexCult Journal permission to evaluate, normalize, edit and publish the submitted article, in an unprecedented way.
Plagiarism cases and self plagiarism will not be accepted under no circumstances. The plagiarist will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years.
The copy, in full or to some extent, of an article published in LexCult Journal will be allowed as long as the source (author and Journal) is informed, being forbidden the commercial use and the production and distribution of derivative works. In case the exclusivity clause is broken, the submission will be filed and the author will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years, without bringing any civil actions provided by national law.
The author is aware that:
a) Submissions may be rejected if the journal's Editorial Board, responsible for evaluation and article selection, does not consider it pertinent for publication, whatever may be the well-justified reasons;
b) Editors reserve the right to modify the submitted manuscript - without any content alteration - in view of its normalization and adaptation to the publication norms.
