THE INDIVIDUAL AND THE SOCIETY BEYOND THE PARTIES AND HOLE DICOTOMY
A PSYCHOANALYTIC AND PHILOSOPHICAL READING
Abstract
This article aims to carry out a transdisciplinary ontological reflection, starting from epistemological principles of philosophy, sociology and psychoanalysis, on the relationship between subject and society. We start from the assumption that there is no breach of continuity between them, no transcendence of the social (whole) over the individual (parts). In other words, the State does not impose itself on the social, “taming” the chaotic nature of the human being, just as society does not impose itself on the individual. We believe that, in both cases, there is no relation of transcendence or split, but of immanence, imbrication. Society produces subjectivities, to the same extent that it produces itself. In this sense, our objective is to make, from the theoretical matrices presented, an inflection that the life experienced collectively (not in abstract), is exactly what allows the realization of human powers in a full way, something that is never achieved in isolation , without breaking with our “habitual” isolation. Finally, we will inquire about the possibility of the emergence of an alternative society in which individuals can reconstruct the sense of community from a collective experience that occurs in "living with", "living together" without, however, giving in to temptation to merge with the “flock” conformism that nullifies the singularities. A de-subjectified community, which does not need the egoic subject, but not the communion with the other. The methodology of our investigation will focus on the bibliographic analysis of reference authors such as Castoriadis, Freud, Marx, among others.
Downloads
References
DELEUZE, Giles; GUATTARI, Felix. Mil platôs. Rio de Janeiro: Ed.34, 1995.
ELIAS, Norbert. A sociedade dos indivíduos. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar Editores, 1994.
FREUD, Sigmund. Mal-estar na Civilização. In: O futuro de uma ilusão, o Mal-estar na civilização e outros trabalhos (1927-1931). Rio de Janeiro: Imago, 1996. v. 21.
FROMM, Erich. Sane society. London: Routledge Editors, 1995.
FROMM, Erich. A arte de amar. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1990.
MARX, Karl. O capital. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial, 2011.
MORIN, Edgar. Introdução ao pensamento complexo. Porto Alegre: Sulina, 2005.
NANCY, Jean-Luc. Prefácio. In: ESPOSITO, Roberto. Communitas: Origen y destino de la comunidade. Buenos Aires: Ed. Amorrotu, 2003.
NANCY, Jean-Luc. A comunidade inoperada. Rio de Janeiro: 7 Letras, 2016.
SPINOZA, Baruch de. Ética. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2009.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with recognition of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The author declares to be responsible for the originality, uniqueness and currency of the article content, by means of complete references to all consulted sources.
Each author grants to the LexCult Journal permission to evaluate, normalize, edit and publish the submitted article, in an unprecedented way.
Plagiarism cases and self plagiarism will not be accepted under no circumstances. The plagiarist will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years.
The copy, in full or to some extent, of an article published in LexCult Journal will be allowed as long as the source (author and Journal) is informed, being forbidden the commercial use and the production and distribution of derivative works. In case the exclusivity clause is broken, the submission will be filed and the author will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years, without bringing any civil actions provided by national law.
The author is aware that:
a) Submissions may be rejected if the journal's Editorial Board, responsible for evaluation and article selection, does not consider it pertinent for publication, whatever may be the well-justified reasons;
b) Editors reserve the right to modify the submitted manuscript - without any content alteration - in view of its normalization and adaptation to the publication norms.