JUSTICE OF WORK AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOCIAL RIGHTS ON CURRENT TIMES
Abstract
This paper will discuss the current ruling of the Federal Supreme Court (STF) under the Default Omission Action (ADO) 26 and the Injunction Warrant (MI) 4473 regarding the equation of LGBTFOBIA crime with racism. Firstly, it discusses the three hypotheses made by Minister Celso de Mello regarding legislative omission, the concept of LGBTFOBIA and the prescription of criminal prosecution. Secondly, it addresses some studies that have shown some difficulties with regard to the criminalization of “racism” in the context of state action and its possible rebounds in labor law, especially as regards the principle of jus postulandi which is one of the principles that guarantee the autonomy of this branch of law. The research framework is centered on historical institutionalism, notably that of poststructuralist influence, centered on the analyzes of Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze. The research method is centered on the analysis of jurisprudence of the Supreme Court. The objective of the research is to analyze some possible effects of the “Labor Reform” carried out in 2017, by means of an STF decision that reformulated the “Risk Theory” and that possibly “impacted” the “Company Theory”. , the Consumer Protection Code and the performance of the Public Prosecution Service and the Public Defender's Office.
Downloads
References
BRASIL. Lei n. 7.716, de 5 de janeiro de 1989. Define os crimes resultantes de preconceito de raça ou de cor. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 1989. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l7716.htm. Acesso em: 20 maio 2019.
BRASIL. Lei n. 8.666, de 21 de junho de 1993. Regulamenta o art. 37, inciso XXI, da Constituição Federal, institui normas para licitações e contratos da Administração Pública e dá outras providências. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 1993. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Leis/L8666cons.htm. Acesso em: 20 maio 2019.
BRASIL. Ministério da Justiça e Segurança Pública. Levantamento nacional de informações penitenciárias: INFOPEN Mulheres - junho de 2017. Organização de Marcos Vinícius Moura. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Justiça e Segurança Pública; Departamento Penitenciário Nacional, 2017.
DELEUZE, Gilles. Instintos e instituições. In: LAPOUJADE, David. A ilha deserta e outros textos. São Paulo: Iluminuras, 2004. p. 134-137.
FERREIRA, Renato. Ações afirmativas: a questão das cotas. Rio de Janeiro: Impetus, 2012.
GALDINO, Daniela; BERNARDINO-COSTA, Joaze. Levando a raça a sério. Rio de Janeiro: DP&A, 2004.
HALL, Peter A.; TAYLOR, Rosemary C. R. As três versões do neo-institucionalismo. Lua Nova, São Paulo, n. 58, p. 193-223, 2003.
HARAWAY, Donna. Gênero para um dicionário marxista: a política sexual de uma palavra. Cadernos Pagu, Campinas, n. 22, p. 201-246, 2004.
HENRIQUES, Ricardo. Desigualdade racial no Brasil: evolução das condições de vida na década de 90. Brasília, DF: IPES, 2001.
IPEA. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada. Nota técnica. Planejamento e financiamento das políticas de igualdade racial: possibilidades para o plano plurianual 2012-2015. Brasília, DF: Ipea, 2011.
IPEA. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada. Relatório de pesquisa. Planejamento, orçamento e a promoção da igualdade racial reflexões sobre os planos plurianuais 2004-2007 e 2008-2011. Brasília, DF: Ipea, 2014.
KARASCH, Mary C. A vida dos escravos no Rio de Janeiro (1808-1850). São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2000.
KELSEN, Hans. O problema da justiça. 5. ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2011.
PIRES, Thula. Criminalização do racismo: entre política de reconhecimento e meio de legitimação do controle social sobre os negros. Brasília: Brado Negro, 2016.
SANTOS, Ynaê Lopes. Duas irmãs do atlântico. Rio de Janeiro: Ministério da Cultura, 2010.
VIANNA, Luiz Werneck; BURGOS, Marcelo Baumann; SALLES, Paula Martins. Dezessete anos de judicialização da política. Tempo soc., São Paulo, v. 19, n. 2, p. 39-85, nov. 2007. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ts/v19n2/a02v19n2. Acesso em: 20/05/2019.
VOLTAIRE, François-Marie Arouet. O preço da justiça. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2006.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with recognition of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The author declares to be responsible for the originality, uniqueness and currency of the article content, by means of complete references to all consulted sources.
Each author grants to the LexCult Journal permission to evaluate, normalize, edit and publish the submitted article, in an unprecedented way.
Plagiarism cases and self plagiarism will not be accepted under no circumstances. The plagiarist will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years.
The copy, in full or to some extent, of an article published in LexCult Journal will be allowed as long as the source (author and Journal) is informed, being forbidden the commercial use and the production and distribution of derivative works. In case the exclusivity clause is broken, the submission will be filed and the author will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years, without bringing any civil actions provided by national law.
The author is aware that:
a) Submissions may be rejected if the journal's Editorial Board, responsible for evaluation and article selection, does not consider it pertinent for publication, whatever may be the well-justified reasons;
b) Editors reserve the right to modify the submitted manuscript - without any content alteration - in view of its normalization and adaptation to the publication norms.
