THE DIALOGUE BETWEEN ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND CAPS III
Abstract
This study presents the insertion of a Federal Public Defender together with the multiprofessional team in a group composed of family members and users of a CAPS III device, in view of the increasing number of users who had applications for benefits dismissed by social security in this device. By causing growth in the number of resources with overload to family members in the care of the user. The objective of this work is to discuss the impact of this situation in the perspective of care overload. This research had a qualitative character, made through observation participant in meetings with the family groups during two years, with legal support once every month. Fifteen family members of the CAPS III family group, who had the benefit of continuing care (BPC) canceled and / or those who requested the benefit, were absent for this reason. Of the 15 relatives that the DPU filed a lawsuit, 10 of them were able to review the benefits, 3 of them had the benefit denied and only 2 families had the case filed by the local court. With the inclusion of legal guidance offered to users and their respective families, we see new possibilities for intervention transforming the city's eyes and attitudes towards those suffering from psychological distress, minimizing the impacts presented by the family's overload of care.
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with recognition of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The author declares to be responsible for the originality, uniqueness and currency of the article content, by means of complete references to all consulted sources.
Each author grants to the LexCult Journal permission to evaluate, normalize, edit and publish the submitted article, in an unprecedented way.
Plagiarism cases and self plagiarism will not be accepted under no circumstances. The plagiarist will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years.
The copy, in full or to some extent, of an article published in LexCult Journal will be allowed as long as the source (author and Journal) is informed, being forbidden the commercial use and the production and distribution of derivative works. In case the exclusivity clause is broken, the submission will be filed and the author will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years, without bringing any civil actions provided by national law.
The author is aware that:
a) Submissions may be rejected if the journal's Editorial Board, responsible for evaluation and article selection, does not consider it pertinent for publication, whatever may be the well-justified reasons;
b) Editors reserve the right to modify the submitted manuscript - without any content alteration - in view of its normalization and adaptation to the publication norms.
